Online Trademark Objections Reply in Faridabad
If youa are from a Faridabad looking to start your business, one of the first things you should consider is securing your brand name or logo through
trademark registration. Protecting your brand ensures that no one else can copy or misuse it, giving you exclusive rights over its use. As your business grows, safeguarding your brand identity becomes even more important. Trademark registration not only protects your brand from
Trademark infringement but also enhances its market value and recognition.
However, the Trademark Office may raise objections, delaying or even preventing registration. One common issue applicants face is trademark objections. If your trademark application is similar to an already registered mark, lacks distinctiveness, or violates certain legal provisions, it may be objected to by the Trademark Office. Validity of the Trademark is for 10 years and after the 10 years application of
Trademark renewal is submitted to the Trademark registry.
At Compliance Calendar LLP, we offer a streamlined online trademark registration process in Faridabad, with expert guidance from our IP attorneys who have over a decade of experience. Our registered office is located in Faridabad, providing you with easy access to discuss any concerns regarding trademark objections or your overall IP strategy.
Our attorneys help clients regarding the
trademark search report, ensuring that your proposed mark does not conflict with any existing trademarks. We then guide you through the preparation of the necessary documents and submission of your application (Form TM-A). Should you face a trademark objection, our team will assist in formulating a comprehensive response to address the examiner’s concerns and improve your chances of successful registration.
The complete trademark registration process in India includes conducting a detailed trademark search, preparing the required documentation, and submitting your application along with the applicable fees of Rupees 4500 (for individual/SME applicants) or Rupees 9000 (for others). If you receive an objection, we will guide you through the necessary steps to resolve the issue and continue toward successful registration. Our goal is to ensure that your brand identity is protected and your business enjoys the full benefits of trademark registration.
Choosing the Right Trademark Class for Registration in Faridabad
As, Faridabad is renowned for its rich culture, diverse cuisine, educational institutions, and vibrant fashion. Here are the relevant trademark classes that are particularly significant for Faridabad people:
• Class 25: Covers clothing and footwear brands, which are immensely popular in Faridabad's bustling fashion markets.
• Class 30: Encompasses food and beverage companies, reflecting Faridabad’s love for its iconic street food and culinary diversity.
• Class 41: Pertains to educational services, highlighting the city's reputation as an educational hub with top-tier institutions and learning centers.
What is a Trademark Objection?
A
trademark objection is a formal challenge raised by the Trademark Examiner in response to a trademark application. When the examiner finds issues with the trademark, it leads to an objection, providing the applicant with an opportunity to rectify the problem before proceeding with the registration process.
In Faridabad, the trademark application is filed with the Faridabad Trademark Registry, which is one of the five regional offices of the Office of the Controller General of Patents, Designs, and Trademarks (CGPDTM). If the application doesn't meet the requirements specified by the Trade Marks Act, 1999, the examiner issues an objection.
A trademark objection is a formal refusal or challenge raised by the Trademark Examiner during the trademark registration process. When you apply for a trademark, the Trademarks Office reviews your application to ensure it complies with the legal requirements under the Trade Marks Act, 1999. If the examiner finds that the application doesn’t meet these requirements, they issue an objection. This objection must be addressed by the applicant before the registration can proceed.
Another reason for objection is when the trademark is descriptive or generic—trademarks that merely describe the goods or services they represent or are common in everyday language cannot be registered, as they fail to distinguish one business from another. Additionally, trademarks that contain prohibited or offensive words, symbols, or imagery, or those that might mislead consumers, are also subject to objection. The trademark office may also object if the application contains errors, such as incorrect or incomplete information, or if the wrong class has been selected for the goods or services.
Trademark objections are common and can arise for various reasons, including issues of similarity with existing trademarks, lack of distinctiveness, or non-compliance with specific legal grounds. Once an objection is raised, the applicant typically has 30 days to respond to it. If the objection is not resolved, it can prevent the trademark from being registered.
Common Grounds for Trademark Objection in Faridabad
Several grounds can lead to the objection of a trademark application. Some of the most common reasons for objections in Faridabad include:
1. Similarity to an Existing Trademark
• Ground: Under Section 11 of the Trade Marks Act, an application will be refused if the trademark is identical or deceptively similar to an existing registered trademark or a well-known mark. The examiner checks if there are any trademarks already registered that are similar in terms of design, name, or overall look.
• Example: A company applying for the trademark “Kool Cola” may face objections if there’s already a similar mark like “Cool Cola” registered.
2. Lack of Distinctiveness
• Ground: A trademark must be capable of distinguishing the goods or services of one business from those of others. If the examiner finds that the mark is too generic, descriptive, or lacks uniqueness, the application may be rejected.
• Example: A term like “Best Coffee” may be refused as it is considered a descriptive term for coffee and lacks distinctiveness.
3. Descriptiveness and Deceptiveness
• Ground: Section 9 of the Trade Marks Act prohibits the registration of marks that are descriptive, misleading, or deceptive in nature. A trademark that gives a false impression about the product or service will not be accepted.
• Example: A mark like “Fresh Milk” for a soap brand could be objectionable because it misleads consumers into thinking it’s a dairy product.
4. Non-Compliance with Absolute Grounds
• Ground: Section 9 also lists absolute grounds for refusal, including marks that:
o Use national symbols (e.g., the Indian flag or the Ashoka Chakra)
o Are offensive, scandalous, or immoral
o Are identical to a geographical indication or well-known name
• Example: A trademark that uses India’s national flag or the name of a well-known landmark like "Taj Mahal" would likely face objections.
5. Lack of Proper Documentation
• Ground: A trademark application can be rejected if it is incomplete or improperly filed. Missing documents, such as a signed power of attorney or failure to provide proper classification of goods and services, can result in an objection.
• Example: If the applicant fails to submit the necessary documents to prove the trademark’s usage, the application could be questioned.
Section 9: Absolute Grounds for Refusal
Section 9 of the Act provides absolute grounds for refusal of trademark registration. These objections focus primarily on the inherent characteristics of the mark itself, regardless of the identity or goodwill of the applicant. Common objections under this section include:
1. Lack of Distinctiveness: Marks that are not capable of distinguishing the goods or services of one entity from another are not eligible for registration. For instance, generic terms like “food” for food products would face objections.
2. Descriptive Marks: Trademarks that merely describe the characteristics, quality, purpose, or other attributes of goods or services, such as “Sweet” for a confectionery product, are objectionable unless they have acquired distinctiveness through extensive use.
3. Deceptive Marks: Marks that are likely to deceive the public, such as those misrepresenting the nature or quality of goods, fall under this category.
4. Prohibited Marks: Marks that are obscene, scandalous, or contrary to public policy are also barred under Section 9.
Response to an Objection under Section 9:
1. Evidence of Distinctiveness:
Provide evidence showing that the trademark has acquired a secondary meaning and is recognized by the public as distinctive for the applicant's goods or services.
2. Prior Use Evidence:
Submit proof of extensive and long-term use of the trademark, including sales figures, marketing materials, advertisements, and invoices.
3. Consumer Recognition:
Demonstrate the popularity of the trademark through surveys, articles, or testimonials.
4. Geographical Significance:
If the objection relates to geographical origin, establish that the trademark has no direct reference to the goods' origin or that it is associated with the applicant.
5. Legal Precedents:
Cite relevant case laws where similar objections were overruled in favor of the applicant.
Section 11: Relative Grounds for Refusal
Section 11 of the Act deals with relative grounds for refusal, which consider the potential conflict between the applicant’s mark and pre-existing trademarks. Objections under this section typically arise due to:
1. Similarity with an Earlier Trademark (Section 11(1)):
The trademark is identical or similar to an earlier registered trademark and is proposed for similar or related goods or services, leading to a likelihood of public confusion.
2. Reputation of an Earlier Trademark (Section 11(2)):
If the trademark is identical or similar to an earlier well-known trademark, its registration might:
o Take unfair advantage of the earlier trademark's reputation.
o Be detrimental to the distinctive character or repute of the well-known trademark.
3. Prohibition by Law (Section 11(3)):
The trademark's use is prohibited under any law, or it is of a nature that might deceive the public or cause harm to religious sentiments.
4. Honest Concurrent Use (Section 12):
Section 11 objections can sometimes be addressed if the applicant can establish honest concurrent use under Section 12 of the Act.
Response to an Objection under Section 11:
When responding to an objection raised under Section 11, the following points can be emphasized:
1. Distinctiveness Argument:
Demonstrate that the trademark has distinctive features that differentiate it from the earlier trademark, even if they are similar.
2. No Likelihood of Confusion:
Argue that the goods/services are unrelated, and there is no likelihood of confusion in the minds of the public.
3. Coexistence Evidence:
Provide evidence that the trademark has been in use for a significant period without any disputes or confusion.
4. Honest Concurrent Use:
If applicable, establish that the applicant and the earlier trademark owner have been using their respective marks concurrently and honestly in the market.
5. Consent from Earlier Trademark Owner:
Obtain a no-objection certificate (NOC) or consent letter from the owner of the earlier trademark.
6. Legal Precedents and Public Interest:
Cite relevant case laws and show that the registration of the mark will not harm public interest or the rights of the earlier trademark owner.
Challenges in Trademark Objections in Faridabad
Once a trademark objection is raised, the applicant has the opportunity to respond within a specified time, usually 1 month from the date of the objection notice. Here’s the step-by-step process for responding to a trademark objection:
1. Review the Objection Notice
• The first step is to carefully review the objection notice from the Trademark Office. This notice will detail the exact reasons for the objection. Understanding the grounds of objection is critical for formulating a strong response.
2. Prepare a Detailed Response
• The response to the objection must be drafted in a formal and legally appropriate manner. The applicant needs to address the specific objections raised by the examiner. The response may involve:
o Legal Arguments: Arguing that the trademark does not conflict with any existing marks or that it is distinctive enough for registration.
o Supporting Documents: Providing evidence such as proof of prior use, public recognition of the mark, or arguments demonstrating that the mark is not confusingly similar to others.
o Amendments: If the objection is based on a descriptive or non-distinctive term, the applicant may propose a change or modification to make the mark distinctive.
3. File the Response
• The response should be filed online through the Trademark Registry Portal. The response must be filed within the 30-day window. If no response is submitted, the application is deemed abandoned.
4. Attend a Hearing (if required)
• In some cases, if the response to the objection is unsatisfactory or if the examiner is still unsure about the application’s eligibility, a
trademark hearing may be scheduled. The applicant (or their legal representative) will be asked to present their case in front of the examiner.
5. Final Decision
• After the response or hearing, the examiner will decide whether to grant the trademark registration or uphold the objection. If the trademark is accepted, it will be published in the Trademark Journal, allowing for any third-party for
Trademark opposition. If the objection is upheld, the applicant may appeal to the Intellectual Property Appellate Board (IPAB) or take further legal action.
Suggestions for Overcoming Trademark Objections in Faridabad
While objections can be frustrating, there are steps you can take to ensure a higher chance of success in overcoming them:
1. Conduct a Comprehensive Trademark Search
• Before filing, conduct a thorough search to ensure that your trademark is not too similar to existing marks. This can help you avoid objections related to similarity and save time.
2. Ensure Distinctiveness
• The more unique and distinctive your trademark, the higher the chance of overcoming objections. Avoid generic or descriptive terms and consider designing a logo or mark that stands out in the marketplace.
3. File a Clear and Complete Application
• Ensure that all required documents are submitted correctly and that the application is filled out with accurate details. Incomplete or incorrect applications often lead to objections.
4. Seek Legal Help
• Trademark law can be complex, especially when objections arise. Engaging an experienced IP attorney or trademark agent can help you craft a strong response and guide the process more efficiently.
5. Respond Promptly
• Always respond to the objection within the stipulated 30-day period. A prompt and well-reasoned response shows your intent to move forward with the registration process.
If you have received trademark objections under Sections 9 and 11, Compliance Calendar LLP is here to help you resolve them. Contact us at tm@ccoffice.in or call us at 9988424211 for expert assistance.
Compliance Calendar ®