Case Analysis: Haldiram India Pvt. Ltd. vs. Berachah Sales Corporation & Ors.

Case Analysis: Haldiram India Pvt. Ltd. vs. Berachah Sales Corporation & Ors.. The case of Haldiram India Pvt. Ltd. vs. Berachah Sales Corporation & Ors. centers on the protection of the "Haldiram" trademark, a name synonymous with Indian snacks and sweets. The Delhi High Court's ruling in this matter underscores the significance of safeguarding well-established trademarks from unauthorized use. 
Background
Haldiram India Pvt. Ltd., established in 1941, has built a formidable reputation in the food industry, both domestically and internationally. The company holds registered trademarks for its distinctive logos:
• V-shaped logo: Registered under Class 30, with usage claimed since November 30, 1965
• Oval-shaped logo: Registered under Class 30 since January 23, 2003. In 2019, Berachah Sales Corporation and its associated entities incorporated "Haldiram Restro Pvt. Ltd." and began using the "Haldiram" name for their products and services, including registering the domain " and selling various food products. This prompted Haldiram India Pvt. Ltd. to file a suit seeking a permanent injunction against the defendants for trademark infringement and to have "Haldiram" recognized as a well-known trademark. 
Legal Issues
1. Trademark Infringement: Did the defendants' use of the "Haldiram" name constitute unauthorized use and create a likelihood of confusion among consumers?
2. Well-Known Trademark Status: Is the "Haldiram" mark eligible to be declared a well-known trademark under Section 2(1)(zg) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999
3. Court's Analysis and Decision: The Delhi High Court proceeded ex parte against the defendants due to their absence in the proceedings. The court noted that the defendants' marks were identical to Haldiram's, used for similar services within the same trade channels, thereby satisfying the "triple identity test" for trademark infringement. Consequently, a permanent injunction was granted, restraining the defendants from using the "Haldiram" name or any deceptively similar marks. Regarding the well-known trademark status, the court considered factors outlined in Section 11(6) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, such as the mark's recognition, duration of use, and promotional efforts. Acknowledging Haldiram's extensive use and reputation, both in India and internationally, the court declared "Haldiram" and its oval-shaped logo as well-known trademarks in relation to food items and restaurant services. 
Damages and Costs
The court awarded Haldiram India Pvt. Ltd. damages of Rs.50 lakhs and costs of Rs.2 lakhs, considering the defendants' unauthorized use of the trademark and their non-participation in the legal proceedings. 
Conclusion
This ruling reinforces the importance of protecting well-established trademarks and serves as a deterrent against unauthorized use of renowned brands. The recognition of "Haldiram" as a well-known trademark provides broader protection, preventing its unauthorized use across diverse goods and services

The case of Haldiram India Pvt. Ltd. vs. Berachah Sales Corporation & Ors. centers on the protection of the "Haldiram" trademark, a name synonymous with Indian snacks and sweets. The Delhi High Court's ruling in this matter underscores the significance of safeguarding well-established trademarks from unauthorized use.

Background

Haldiram India Pvt. Ltd., established in 1941, has built a formidable reputation in the food industry, both domestically and internationally. The company holds registered trademarks for its distinctive logos:

• V-shaped logo: Registered under Class 30, with usage claimed since November 30, 1965

• Oval-shaped logo: Registered under Class 30 since January 23, 2003. In 2019, Berachah Sales Corporation and its associated entities incorporated "Haldiram Restro Pvt. Ltd." and began using the "Haldiram" name for their products and services, including registering the domain " and selling various food products. This prompted Haldiram India Pvt. Ltd. to file a suit seeking a permanent injunction against the defendants for trademark infringement and to have "Haldiram" recognized as a well-known trademark.

Legal Issues

1. Trademark Infringement: Did the defendants' use of the "Haldiram" name constitute unauthorized use and create a likelihood of confusion among consumers?

2. Well-Known Trademark Status: Is the "Haldiram" mark eligible to be declared a well-known trademark under Section 2(1)(zg) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999

3. Court's Analysis and Decision: The Delhi High Court proceeded ex parte against the defendants due to their absence in the proceedings. The court noted that the defendants' marks were identical to Haldiram's, used for similar services within the same trade channels, thereby satisfying the "triple identity test" for trademark infringement. Consequently, a permanent injunction was granted, restraining the defendants from using the "Haldiram" name or any deceptively similar marks. Regarding the well-known trademark status, the court considered factors outlined in Section 11(6) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, such as the mark's recognition, duration of use, and promotional efforts. Acknowledging Haldiram's extensive use and reputation, both in India and internationally, the court declared "Haldiram" and its oval-shaped logo as well-known trademarks in relation to food items and restaurant services.

Damages and Costs

The court awarded Haldiram India Pvt. Ltd. damages of Rs.50 lakhs and costs of Rs.2 lakhs, considering the defendants' unauthorized use of the trademark and their non-participation in the legal proceedings.

Conclusion

This ruling reinforces the importance of protecting well-established trademarks and serves as a deterrent against unauthorized use of renowned brands. The recognition of "Haldiram" as a well-known trademark provides broader protection, preventing its unauthorized use across diverse goods and services

Case Analysis: Haldiram India Pvt. Ltd. vs. Berachah Sales Corporation & Ors.

Background

Legal Issues

Damages and Costs

Conclusion

Share this article:

Search more articles:

You may also like